I

Intercourse vision of the dead

Interpretation of Al zahri

 

Intercourse vision of the dead

Ja’far al-Sadiq said: intercourse vision of what the dead did not come down seer is better and for the benefit and the Murad revealed his vision and was invalidated by the work of Satan.

It felt: because it combines a woman dead known it to get better and achieve what Aamlh terms do not count, although the deceased is a man known as Universal access is good for that man and charity, pay and charity of the seer, though dead an unidentified man did not know it win and victory over enemies.

It felt: it is intercourse with a dead woman with a mahram for it are distressed and was good to get behind me.

It felt: that he is having intercourse with his wife deceased there is nothing good in it.

It felt: that he is having intercourse with his relatives are dead, for it is great.

It felt: it is intercourse with dead Jalil much is known for it to do good from the issuance of the seer in the right of the Dead.

It felt: that the dead Ejammah it indicates the arrival of the livelihood of the wealth of the deceased behind me.

It felt: it accepts the dead desire it issues from the seer in the right of the Dead is better and charity, and prayer.

It felt: that the dead have intercourse with a bit of dead animal is on the two sides: the best benefit or is hated, has made About the dead mentioned in the chapter intercourse sexual intercourse so as not to become a free chapter of this meaning.

 

Administration’s vision for the dead and taking it

Of the opinion that the dead had gave him a bit of food and drink did not eat it detract from his wealth as much as that, though it is better to eat it and benefit, and gave him something of the pleasures of this world to get it good and the arrival of hope.

It felt: dead gave him a thing of the garment and wear it for g and severe illness, although not worn and left him dead and took him to wear it evidence of his journey from this world sooner.

It felt: that the dead, gave him two garments bathed in it to get richer.

It felt: dead had not gave him a garment of clothing are tailored and eat and wear, and gave him the castle and for the deceased to wear it then it is evidence of the deceased’s death his family handed it if it does not reward to the dead what happened to him but that the shortage was more than his money.

It felt: that he handed his clothes and then dead, said a plan or wash it so that never goes out of his hand did not enter into it for the dead king and the severity of g and a narrow chest, and that dealt with the dead and to wear it dies sooner.

It felt: that the dead had lent his clothes and then he was told it is evidence of the poverty that dead for good and forgiveness.

It felt: dead had gave him a garment fashioned it shows a lack of seer, but a new dress, it demonstrates the richness and the ability.

It felt: dead had gave him something from the Koran and books of fiqh, and so it is evidence for success in the obedience and good works.

It felt: that he had sold it for something dead expensive proof of that thing.

It felt: it was endowed with something of the dead and therefore get his response and lack of harmful.

It felt: that the deceased gave him something of pets is lower than where he does not count.

It felt: that the deceased gave him a new shirt or dress it receives a clean living, such as days of his life, and gave him Talsana get it good and the benefit and prestige.

It felt: that the dead and gave him something was impure dress it commits immorality.

It felt: that the deceased gave him food for it in terms of income is not counted.

It felt: it gave him a watermelon afflicted they did not expect.

It felt: that it gave him the money honey on the one hand in terms of the booty is not counted.

It felt: that the note of the Dead knows it affects the goodness in his religion as much as that.

It felt: he gave the hood Dead it a lack of money or fall ill, but the disease cured.

It felt: that he disarm his clothes, and dressed it for the dead later by the knowledge that she went out of his property, otherwise it does not affect him and everything he sees that he gave him the living dead is not Mahmoud except on two issues.

But felt that he gave his uncle, aunt or something, it affects inheritance .

And the vision of Uncle and Aunt in any way the integrity of the cloud .

It felt: that the dead bought the food, it would be a small presence, and be sold Kassado.

It felt: the goods of any thing and the thing was dead, whether human or animal, these goods go and spoil their origin.

It felt: that the dead gave him something unknown, did not achieve what it is to the benefit of all, as well as The Dead gave something unknown that does not affect him.

It felt: that the dead by unidentified group gives something he does not understand is Ionnbhm it.

And Ibn Sirin: I like to take from the dead and give them, and wholesale whenever a person sees that the dead gave him something he is good unless it is something of the genus vermin Alloadg, and the administration in all respects it is not Mahmoud unless he dislikes one of the sex of the above is the demise of their distressed .

 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Close
Close